This does not pretend to be an objective document.
In the early '80s, 6-sprocket clusters came in, and so the 10-speed became a 12-speed. As time went on sprocket clusters with more and more gears were introduced, and gradually the usage for "'N'-speed" changed to refer to just the number of rear sprockets, so a "12-speed" might also be called a "6-speed" disregarding the number of chainwheels.
Now that 10-sprocket clusters are in wide use, the term "10-speed" has become confusing as a result. In older contexts, it refers to the classic 5x2 setup, but riders of newer bikes often use it to distinguish their 10x2 (or 10x3) setups from earlier 9x2 (or 9x3) drive trains.
See also the "Speeds" entry in this Glossary.
This is the size that was used on most older 10- and 12-speed road bikes made for the U.S. or British market from the 1960s through the early '80s.
Note on tire/rim compatibility: Traditional 630 mm (27 inch) rims were straight side design, but in the late '70s they evolved to a "hook edge" design which would permit the use of higher pressures.
These days, many 630 mm (27 inch) tires are marked "For hook edge rims only" (some companies use the term "crochet type" instead of "hook edge"...this is the result of poor translation. "Crochet" is French for "hook.")
Modern 630 mm (27 inch) tires will work on older straight-side rims, but they won't handle as much pressure as with hook edge rims.
Generally, the "rule of thumb" for traditional 630 mm (27 inch) tires is that they should be inflated to 70-75 psi. This shouldn't be a problem with any tire, despite whatever disclaimer the manufacturer puts on the sidewall. However, if you're restricted to this pressure range, you probably shouldn't be running tires narrower than 1 1/8", or preferably 1 1/4" wide, unless you're a very lightweight rider.
Schwinn also caused some confusion because it often referred to "27 inch tubular rims." In this case, the adjective "tubular" refers to the way the rims were manufactured, not to anything unusual about the tires. Schwinn "tubular" rims were made from steel tubing that was rolled into the shape of a rim cross section. The 27-inch size takes normal 630 mm clinchers. (The confusion is compounded by the fact that many other older Schwinns did use non-standard tires, but that was only in 26 inch and smaller models. See also: Tire Sizing
The 28 x [fraction] x [fraction] designation is mainly used in Germany and the Netherlands, and causes no end of confusion. Most of the rest of the world knows these by the French designation "700C"
The ISO 622 mm size is also sometimes known in Canada as 28 x 1 1 /2 F.13.
English bikes used 32 in front, 40 in back, which actually makes a lot of sense, because, it is very unusual to have a problem with front wheels, but much more common to have trouble with rears. This is partly because of the normal weight distribution that puts more weight on the rear wheel, partly because the rear wheel is the one that drives the bike forward.
The rear wheel problem is especially severe with bikes that use derailer gearing, because the rear wheel has to be "dished" off center to make room for the multiple sprockets. This is accomplished by making the left side spokes very loose. It results in the right side spokes' carrying most of the load, and the left side spokes' providing poor stability.
The English switched over to 36/36 in the late 1960s, mainly to simplify parts stockage.
So, as I said, almost all bikes used 36/36 spoking. The exception was a few high performance time trial racing bikes where the builder was looking for any possible place to shave off a few grams. Some of these bikes used 32 spoke wheels.
This scam was so successful that all of the manufacturers followed suit, laughing all the way to the bank, and the riders suffered the results of the more fragile wheels.
These days it is common to see mass-produced bikes and aftermarket wheelsets with 24 or fewer spokes in each wheel. These are represented as "premium" wheels, though they generally have off-brand hubs that are a lot cheaper than genuine Shimano or Campagnolo hubs.
Naive consumers often fall for this scam, thinking the wheels must offer higher performance due to having fewer spokes. They don't realize that these wheels make up for the lost strength of the missing spokes by using substantially heavier rims! These trendy wheels look lighter than traditional wheels, but they aren't. Some of these wheels are unreliable -- and dangerous because if one spoke breaks, there are too few others to keep the rim stable.
Many of these wheels also have nonstandard spokes that can be hard to find when a replacement is needed.
The 1986 600EX group was the second to receive S.I.S. indexed shifting shifting, after original Dura-Ace. Shimano "trickled down" S.I.S. to the 600EX group with a longer cable travel, which became the standard for the rest of the Shimano line. This led to a decade of incompatibility between Dura-Ace and the rest of the Shimano line, only resolved in 1997 when Dura-Ace went to 9-speed and lengthened the cable travel to match the rest of the line.
The 6-speed 600EX shifters had an unfortunate design flaw: The indexing unit had 5 tiny tabs that engaged notches in the bushing that fits against the down tube. These little tabs are fragile and by now most of them have broken. They don't generally break all at once, but as they start to go the shifting gets more and more erratic. There is no fix for this except to replace the shift lever. This is a good time to upgrade to 7-speeds or more.
See also Shimano Models
There is no such size as "650." There are four different sizes that include the number "650" as part of their designation in the French system :
As if 3 different terms for the same size weren't enough, now there's a wrong-headed move afoot to create a forth designation for the 584 mm size: Twenty-seven Five!
All 42s are "A"s; All 39s and 41s are "B"s by definition.
There are two kinds of 53s:
50s and 52s are all "B" type. Other sizes have no letter designation.
If you have poor shifting skills, matching the chainrings by the letters will give very slightly smoother shifting, but if you're a reasonably skilled cyclist, it really doesn't matter.
A claw-shaped metal stamping for attaching a rear derailer to a frame that does not have a built-in derailer hanger. It is secured to the dropout by a small bolt with a special-shaped nut that fits in the back of the dropout's axle slot, and also by the rear axle nut or quick release skewer.
|Dropout with built-in hanger||Plain dropout||Plain dropout with adaptor claw|
The bearings of a cup-and-cone bottom bracket are adjusted by screwing the adjustable cup in or out of the bottom bracket shell, and the adjustment is secured by the lockring.
See also the Bottom Bracket Glossary Entry and my Tool Tips article on Bottom Bracket Adjustment.
Probably the oldest "ærodynamic" part is the drop handlebar. Many other bicycle parts are available in "æro" versions, including:
Æro bars make possible a significant improvement in speed, but with less secure control of the bicycle. They also eliminate most of the shock absorbency normally provided by the cyclist's bent elbows, so they are not suitable for rough surfaces. They are not usually allowed in mass-start racing.
Æro bars originated from an attempt to duplicate the "tuck" of a downhill skier. They first appeared in 1986 when Pete Penseyres introduced them in the Race Across America (RAAM).
Although they were an instant hit with triathletes and time-trialists, professional racers were slow to accept this innovation. When Greg Lemond rode Scott æro clip-ons to victory in the decisive final time trial of the 1989 Tour de France, the ice was broken, and few racers will now ride time-trial stages without them. Although æro bars originated as racing equipment, and are particularly associated with triathlons, they have also become quite popular with touring cyclists and randonneurs, as much for the relief that they give to the hands and wrists as for their ærodynamic qualities.
Æro levers are generally an improvement over the older type. The pivots are located differently, making it possible to get fairly serious braking from the position where the rider's hand is on top of the lever hood. Non-æro levers would permit the use of this position for gentle deceleration only.
Æro brake levers usually have more mechanical advantage, which is good in general, but may cause problems when they are used with cantilever or drum brakes that require more cable than conventional calipers.
In France, exposed brake cables remained popular longer than elsewhere, because French cyclists sometimes like to transport baguettes home from the boulangerie by resting them crosswise across the brake hoods. The cables help hold the loaves in position.
Airless tires have been obsolete for over a century, but crackpot "inventors" keep trying to bring them back. They are heavy and slow. They give a harsh ride and poor high-speed cornering on rough surfaces. They are also likely to cause wheel damage, due to their poor cushioning ability. A pneumatic tire uses all of the air in the whole tube as a shock absorber, while foam-type "airless" tires/tubes only use the air in the immediate area of impact.
Airless tires are either made of elastomers (rubbery materials) or closed cell foams, which are rubbery materials with lots of tiny air bubbles. The better ones are foam type, because solid elastomers have hardly any shock absorbency.
This sort of material has a non-linear response to compression loads: as a compressive load is applied, the stiffness of the material increases as it gets squashed thinner and thinner. The beauty of pneumatic tires is that the compression is nearly linear.
A basic fact of physics is that pressure is inversely proportional to volume.
Imagine a pneumatic tire that is divided into lots of little segments so that each inch or so of tire is effectively a separate "balloon." Let's say it's 1 inch thick, and when a rider sits on the bike, the tire compresses 1/4 inch. That means the volume of the localized "balloon" is now 75% of what it was before the rider got on, so the pressure in the bubble is going to become 133% of what it was.
If the rider hits a bump that compresses the tire another 1/4 inch, the volume will be half the static value, so the pressure will be double the starting pressure.
If the rider hits a bump that compresses the tire 1/2 inch (plus the static 1/4 inch) the volume will have been reduced to 25% of the base volume, and the pressure will now be 4 times the base pressure!
"Airless" tires that use foam derive their resiliency from the bubbles in the foam, so this describes their general functioning. The bubbles are only part of the mix, though, so a 1 inch thick tire doesn't actually have an inch of air to play with before the bubbles are all compressed as far as they can go. You can only compress the bubbles so much, and the more you compress them, the harder they press back, in geometric progression.
Contrast this with a pneumatic tire, where the whole volume of air in the tire is being compressed as a unit. When you sit on the bike, the bottom part of the tire flattens out, say 1/4 inch, but this only reduces the total air volume by a fraction of a percent. Thus the pressure is nearly constant under all conditions, and the tire can be equally shock-absorbent for the full "travel" of its thickness.
It is this property of providing nearly linear response to external pressure that is the unique feature of pneumatic tires. It is not possible for any system that doesn't have this feature to give as good ride as pneumatics do. This is why every vehicle designed for road use in the last hundred years has used pneumatic tires.
The near-linear response of pneumatic tires is not just a matter of comfort. It also improves traction at higher speeds, because the tires don't tend to bounce as much as harder tires do. Bouncing can cause loss of traction in high speed corners, because when the tire is airborne, it can't have any traction.
A peneumatic tire can compress nearly all the way to the rim without any risk of damage either to the rim or to itself.Airless tires do have their applications. They can work well either where speeds are very slow, or where surfaces are very smooth. Thus, they're pretty satisfactory for wheelchairs, especially those mainly used indoors, and also for railroad trains, roller skates, furniture casters, children's riding toys and wagons.
For adjustment of the spokes of wheels, the word "truing" is used, rather than "alignment".
This tool is sometimes confusingly called a "hex wrench," "Allen key" or "hex key."
The terms involving "hex" can be confusing, because normal cap screws also commonly have (male) hexagonal heads, and hexagonal box or socket wrenches fit them.
I prefer not to use the term "key" for such a tool. Many languages use the same word for "wrench" and "key", but I believe that it is one of the richnesses of the American English language that it makes this distinction. Since "wrench" is not used in this context in British usage, "Allen key" is acceptable if the appropriate accent is used.
One of the nice things about Allen wrenches is that they can be sharpened very easily, just grind the worn part off with a bench grinder, and an old, tired Allen wrench becomes as good as new, so long as you don't let it get too hot while you are grinding it.
In common bicycle usage, "alloy" is usually a synonym for aluminum.
For instance, my 1957 OTB came with a 14/16/19/26 freewheel. The 14/16/19 gave a pretty good cruising range with the 48 tooth chainwheel, the 26 was for climbing hills (there was also a 30 tooth chainwheel for climbing serious hills).
Sometime in the early '70's, advertisers co-opted the term "alpine" and started to apply it to the 40/52-14//28 setups common on mass-produced 10-speeds of the '70's bike boom. As a result, the term became essentially meaningless.
|Standard Cable Routing (A)||Alternate Cable Routing (B)|
On virtually all good quality bicycles, aluminum is used for cranks, chainwheels, rims, handlebars, stems, brake parts and derailer parts.
Aluminum is not suitable for spokes, cables, or highly-stressed threaded fasteners in general.
Most English-speaking countries outside of North America, stick an extra syllable into the word, and call it "aluminium".
See also the excellent article by Scott Nicol.
Different aluminum alloys and treatments are designated by a numerical code, as explained by Jeff Del Papa:
They indicate what other stuff is mixed in with the aluminum. Pure aluminum isn't all that strong. Add some silicon, magnesium, zinc, copper, and other things, and the result will be far stronger.
The first digit tells what "family" it belongs to:
1xxx Commercial aluminium (more than 99 per cent Al) 2xxx Copper 3xxx Manganese 4xxx Silicon 5xxx Magnesium 6xxx Magnesium and silicon 7xxx Zinc 8xxx Other elements
The other 3 digits can be looked up in a table, to tell you how much of each they get, and how good the result is. They are assigned in order requested, they don't have any relationship to how much of each ingredient is used, or the properties of the result. (unlike steel alloys, whose numbers (1020, 4130, 4340) include the carbon content.)
If you see things like -T6, following the alloy series, those describe any heat treating the stuff got after it was made. Getting this done correctly is critical to the strength of the frame. For most aluminum frames, it is done after the frame is welded, as the heat from the welder will change the metal (usually makes aluminum alloys softer) Heat treating typically involves heating to near melting (900-1000F, it melts around 1100F, your oven self cleans at 800-850), holding it there for some amount of time (for thin tube, 1/2-2 hours or so) cooling suddenly (dunk in water), then a long bake (8 or more hours) at a lower temperature (like 350F).
The different alloys vary in tensile strength, corrosion resistance, welding compatibility, ductility, and machineability. The density of aluminum alloys don't vary much at all (under 5%) and the stiffness doesn't change.
Each alloy has good points and bad points. What counts as good, and what is bad depends on what you are going to do with it. Some very strong alloys can't be welded, so they make bad frames, and great chainrings. Another alloy might give up some absolute strength, but gain some resistance to cracking. One may cost more, but the heat treating process is cheaper. If you are bolting or bonding things together, you can mix alloys. If you are going to weld, all the welded parts have to use identical filler material and heat treating schedule. (so you can't mix 6061, and 7005 in the same welded structure)
It's the designer's job to chose correctly among the various tradeoffs. If the designer chose well, even a not particularly exotic material can do the job just fine. Pick wrong, and even exotic super-alloys will break.
Last Updated: by Harriet Fell