Search sheldonbrown.com and sheldonbrown.org
| 700 X 44 | 236 |
| 700 X 38 | 231 |
| 700 X 35 | 230 |
| 700 X 32 | 227 |
| 700 X 28 | 225 |
| 700 X 25 | 223 |
| 700 X 23 | 222 |
| 700 X 20 | 221 |
| 27 X 1 3/8 | 232 |
| 27 X 1 1/4 | 230 |
| 27 X 1 1/8 | 228 |
| 27 X 1 | 226 |
| 26 X 2.125 | 225 |
| 26 X 1.9 | 220 |
| 26 X 1.5 | 212 |
| 26 X 1.25 | 206 |
| 26 X 1.0 (559 mm) | 205 |
| 26 x 1 (650C) | 206 |
| Wide Tubular | 224 |
| Narrow Tubular | 223 |
| 26 X 1 3/8 | 222 |
| 24 | 205 |
| 24 x 1 | 188 |
| 20 X 1.75 (406) | 158 |
| 20 X 1 1/4 (451) | 173 |
| 17 x 1 1/4 | 142 |
| 16 x 1 3/8 | 137 |
![]()
If calibrating these Avocet computers using a rollout test:
(The two results are slightly different. Use the appropriate result for greatest accuracy).
Why? Warning: math ahead!
Avocet gives 2.7273 for miles, and explains that this is 30 / 11 (actually 2.7272727272...)
30/11 is closely related to the ratio of miles per hour to feet per second, 15/22.
These Avocet computers are unusual, then, in being calibrated directly to miles rather than to miles by reference to kilometers.
But for kilometers, the same computers ask for the circumference in millimeters x 0.108.
(The numbers are from an original Avocet 20 manual.)
Now let's see how the mile and kilometer calibrations compare:
2.7432 *11/30 is exactly 1.00584
There are exactly 1.609344 kilometers in a mile, and 1.609344 / 1.600000 is also exactly 1.00584.
![]()